A (relatively) brief conversation I had with a good friend of mine prompted me to write about this. Both of us are reasonably (with the necessary cautions, of course) taken in by the pseudoscience that is the Myers-Briggs personality test. The test is based on Carl Jung’s typological theory. In his 1920 publication, Psychological Types, Jung identified four key psychological functions, each of which could be experienced in an introverted (i) or extraverted (e) way: thinking (Ti/Te), feeling (Fi/Fe), sensation (Si/Se), and intuition (Ni/Ne). Our personalities, and therefore everything associated with our personalities – such as our engagement with people, our perception of our environments, our sexuality, our conduct, our values and beliefs, and our decision-making processes, to name a few – are thus (very broadly) categorized into one of 16 types:
If you’ve not already taken such a test, I would go so far as recommending it – if only just for some fun and light reading. I’ve found that it’s remarkably accurate at categorizing people according to their personality traits. So let’s get into it.
I am classified as INFP – introverted, intuitive, feeling, and perceiving – the ‘idealist’ and the ‘healer/mediator’. My good friend, as an INTP, bearing only one difference in psychological function to me, understandably shares similar sentiments with me. Now if it wasn’t apparent from my previous post, I do often struggle with anxiety. This, in conjunction with introversion, is a tricky path. What I’m getting at is this…
Have you ever had an encounter with someone, and then, long after the encounter is past, still agonized over what you had said, whether anything you said had been offensive, why they had reacted the way that they did, whether you could’ve said something wittier or more relevant…?
*cue resounding nods from the audience*
Me too. Every – Single – Time.
The conversation with my INTP friend was along these lines. I discussed with him the possibility of the existence of parallel dimensions, in which every single alternative scenario of every encounter you have ever had in your life actually exists as a separate dimension, instantaneously, until one of them becomes reality. A myriad parallel dimensions open up as soon as you come into consciousness on a given day, and close as soon as your reality unfolds in your daily life. This morning, a parallel universe existed in which I had yoghurt with granola and papaya, but the dimension which opened up unto me was one in which I had Otees. In a parallel dimension, I was eating veggie noodles at a Chinese restaurant for lunch, but that dimension collapsed in the wake of me eating crackers and cream cheese. Yes, this all sounds delightfully recondite and abstract, but if you’ve ever found yourself wondering about concepts like destiny or fate, then why should parallel dimensions be any less far-fetched?
But, being the empirical scientist that I am, it’s a difficult concept to fully accept. Food for thought, though. The alternatives could exist, in which case all you need to do is to pull them into your reality.
- 16 Personalities (©2011-2016 NERIS Analytics Limited) (accessed 30 Nov 2016)
- The Association for Psychological Type (accessed 30 Nov 2016)